Password security and a comparison of Password Managers

There are two general approaches to password generation and management:

Password Managers which store passwords and have the flexibility to apply different complexity rules to each password or to store a pre-existing password - often required when a password needs to be shared between a team of people. The downside of the storage approach is that the password storage (file/database) needs to be managed carefully - secured, backed up and synchronised to all the devices where you will need to use the passwords. If the password store is lost or corrupted you will lose all the passwords! Destructive viruses such as CryptoLocker can also make a password store unreadable.

Password Generators which use a hash function, like the windevcluster password generator, are easy to use and will repeatedly regenerate the same password when given the same inputs but they do have some limitations, the only way to change a password is to enter a different main password or a different salt value. All the generated passwords are the same length.

What makes a good password?

The capacity of a password can be calculated from length + complexity, to give a measure of password entropy.

e n t r o p y

A password containing only upper- and lower-case characters has 52 possible characters in each digit, adding numerals and other characters will increase this further. Although the calculation of entropy uses a log function, doubling the password length will (approximately) double the entropy.

Entropy denotes the uncertainty in the value of a password and is conventionally expressed in bits. If a password of k bits is chosen at random there are 2^k possible values

	Complexity
Password Length	Numbers 0-9	a-z	a-z, A-Z, 0-9
8	26 bits	37 bits	47 bits
10	33 bits	47 bits	59 bits
11	36 bits	51 bits	65 bits
12	39 bits	56 bits	71 bits
13	43 bits	61 bits	77 bits
14	46 bits	65 bits	80 bits
15	49 bits	70 bits	89 bits
20	66 bits	94 bits	119 bits
50	166 bits	235 bits	297.5 bits

Adding keyboard symbols to the above ($£&^[];!@¢/\> etc ) can be used to further increase the complexity. Randomly including symbols will increase password entropy by around 10% and so is equivalent to making the password one character longer. Unfortunately, keyboards vary in the symbols they support and not all websites accept all characters, some will even silently remove them. Common substitutions such as E => 3 or S => $ are so well known that in practice they do nothing to improve security.

Maximum Time to crack a password based on its entropy:

Entropy	Maximum Time to crack at 350 billion guesses/Sec
47 bits	0.223 Hours
59 bits	457.50 Hours
65 bits	3.342 Years
71 bits	213.92 Years
77 bits	13,690 Years
80 bits	109,527.95 Years
89 bits	56078315.93 Years.
119 bits	6.0213633 e+16 Years

High password entropy will help to protect against 'old school' brute force attacks, but passwords like qwertyuiop or schoolofhardknocks or any common phrase or saying will still be less secure than a random string of the same length. This is because a rainbow table can be used to lookup almost any known phrase or pattern very quickly.

For non-random passwords the calculation of entropy can be modified by applying a set of rules to account for typical language patterns (Shannon Entropy). A Non-Random password will make the Maximum Time to crack much much shorter than any of the figures above.

NIST recommend 80 bits for the most secure passwords to resist a brute force attack. There is no definitive answer to the question of the minimum password strength required to avoid all types of attack; it is a moving target; over time we all need to use longer passwords.

Sensitive systems or situations will demand longer passwords, but high entropy long passwords containing random characters and numbers are more difficult for anyone to memorize. Truly secure passwords quickly become impractical unless you use software to automatically retrieve (or generate) the passwords.

Pass phrases (also known as Diceware) a long password consisting of several random words such as correct horse battery staple have been popularised by XKCD. Pass phrases don’t offer any significant advantage or disadvantage compared to a traditional password of the same entropy: Research paper (PDF). n.b. entropy is not the same as length, a 20 digit diceware password has lower entropy than 20 random characters. Novice typists may find the longer length difficult to type and they can exceed the maximum password length limitations of some websites.

Some badly coded websites only store the first 10 or 15 characters of a password, if a long password is silently truncated to correcthorse that’s suddenly a lot less secure than you would expect. Up until 2012 Microsoft Hotmail did this.

Good password management solutions should be able to cope when a website changes its URL e.g. signup.example.com changes to login.example.com

It is possible that an intruder could attack a popular password generator by passing a rainbow table of common passwords through the same hash algorithm to generate potential passwords in bulk. To prevent this, it is still important when using any password manager to choose the main password carefully, a long, random, difficult-to-guess string.

Copy and Paste vs Autofill

Many password managers offer browser plug-ins that will automatically fill-in password and other things like credit card details. Most password generators just generate the password and require you to copy and paste the password using the standard clipboard.

Some issues to consider with this:

• If you are using a machine that is compromised/has a key logger installed, then it may be possible to read the contents of the clipboard. Although if the machine is already compromised you are likely to have problems with any solution when entering a master password.
  Websites accessing the clipboard were a serious problem when Adobe Flash was still in use.
• If a password is left on the clipboard, you may inadvertently paste it somewhere else, revealing the password to 3rd parties.
• Plugins which auto-fill details have been known to go catastrophically wrong with some shopping cart pages: example where a $10 monthly subscription cost $2,023.

Password expiry

Although rarely enforced for website logins, there are some advantages to changing passwords on a regular basis. If the length of your password means that it could be brute force cracked in 50 days, then changing the password every 49 days makes it impossible for such an attack to succeed.

Conversely if the password is truly strong, there is little to be gained in changing it. Mathematically, moving from never changing one’s password to changing it at every single login attempt (pass or fail) will on average only double the number of attempts it would take to brute force the password. In comparison, adding a single extra character to the password length will make it an order of magnitude more secure.

The one advantage of forcing password changes is that it makes it more difficult for people to reuse the same password on multiple sites.

If a sensitive password has been discovered by a third party, then changing it after 30 days will revoke that access, but in many cases, this will be locking the stable door after the horse has bolted, most organised attacks use the stolen credentials within 2-3 days.

If you do need to change passwords regularly then a password manager with an encrypted database will allow individual passwords to be changed as required.

Could a bad actor calculate the main password, if given one of the generated passwords?

A hash function is mathematically a one-way operation that cannot be reversed, however it is possible that someone could guess which password generator / hash function was used and could then form an attack by passing a dictionary of common passwords through that same hash function one at a time to generate thousands of potential passwords. If they manage to generate a match with the known password, then they have found the main password. A hash function that has been applied to commonly known words, names or numbers is therefore vulnerable to frequency analysis.

To prevent this, it is important when using any password manager to choose the main password carefully, a long, random, difficult-to-guess string that will not be in any dictionary or rainbow table. That just leaves the option of a brute force attack - trying every possible combination. From the figures above, you will see that a suitably long/strong main password will take years to brute force.

For security reasons, MD5 and SHA1, should not be used to generate hash values for files that require protection from attack or tampering. This is because they are vulnerable to hash collisions where two different inputs produce the same hash. For password generation this actually provides a small benefit, MD5 and SHA1 are already non-reversible functions, but even if someone used brute force to determine a match, there is no guarantee this will be the master password, it could just be a hash collision.

Password resets

On-line services often provide a password restore function that can be used to reset the password. It is good practice to select complex answers to such security questions particularly if the 'true' answer would be very simple for an attacker to discover. Password reset answers should be managed just like actual passwords.

Social Engineering

As shown by the 2014 celebrity photo leaks, even a strong password can be vulnerable to a targeted social engineering attack based on user name, security questions and reset/recovery options. One extra defence against this is to have a separate email address which is not tied to your identity in any obvious way and is used only for website logins. So, for example you might have Joe.Bloggs@outlook.com as your real email address and Fred.Flintstone@gmail.com used only for logins.

Comparison of Password Managers

“I have 68 different passwords. If I am not allowed to write any of them down, guess what I am going to do? I am going to use the same password on every one of them” ~ Jesper Johansson (Microsoft)

Related

A really strong password is one that nobody else has ever used - Joseph Bonneau (University of Cambridge)
NIST password recommendations (PDF)
Let them paste passwords - The UK National Cyber Security Centre.
zxcvbn - Realistic password strength estimation
Kerckhoffs’s principle - A cryptosystem should be secure even if everything about the system, except the key, is public knowledge.
LastPass Hacks linked to $150M Cyberheist.
Research paper on browser-integrated password managers
Tavis Ormandy on Password Managers - Tavis recommends your Browser’s password manager, but that restricts you to one web browser.
XSS risks around bookmarklets.
GPU computer clusters can cycle through as many as 350 billion guesses per second.